On Forgiveness
Two of the greatest examples of forgiveness in the Bible are Jesus on the cross saying, "Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing." (Luke 23:34 NIV), and Steven crying out "Lord, do not hold this sin against them!" as he is stoned to death. (Acts 7:59-60 NIV) Both of those are amazing situations where truly godly witnesses were able to overcome severe pain to remember to request good for their tormentors. We aspire to be that holy. I think I would have instead cried out something like "God, why is this happening to me? I've been good....please make it stop."
But in reality, how do we feel others people who forgive. Do we truly believe it is possible for a child to forgive a molester? For a parent to forgive the one who murders his child? For an Auschwitz survivor to forgive her captors? For someone like Jeffrey Daumer to be forgiven by God?
And what about those who are forgiven? Will those who are forgiven for heinous crimes think that it's ok to kill or mutilate again -- especially in those cultures where forgiveness is expected? Would that make groups like the Amish, who forgave the man who killed ten school children, or Christians, who forgave the man who killed their preacher, targets?
And when we feel like the wrongs against us are just too big to forgive...do we lose the forgiveness of God? Look at the following verse:
Mark 11:25 And whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone; so that your Father also who is in heaven may forgive you your transgressions.
And how about the servant who had a huge debt forgiven, only to demand payment of a small debt owed to him. When this was discovered, the man to whom he owed a fortune threw him into prison and tortured him until he could pay (essentially for the rest of his life).
Our salvation is secure, but will God withhold our forgiveness for sins perpetrated after we refuse forgiveness for others?
You may want to do some Bible study on that one -- I'm not going to profess to know the answer.
We've all heard that unforgiveness hurts us more than the one against whom we hold a grudge. Writer Anne Lamott suggests it is like drinking rat poison and expecting the rat to die!
We are not capable of truly forgiving on our own. It takes the assistance of Jesus. But do you truly want to forgive? Do you think the things done to you are worse than the things done to Jesus or to Stephen?
Where do you really stand?
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Daily Devotions for the week of Mar 30 - Apr 3
I'm reading a new book, Clutter-Free Christianity by Robert Jeffress, that is really causing me to think. So much that my brain is filled with so many questions about where I am in my faith that I'm having trouble coming up with devotions that seem worthwhile.
So for the rest of the week, I'll just send some of these questions to you. I think they are really valid and valuable for us to chew on for a while.
Verse:
2 Corinthians 3:18 And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.(NIV)
Tuesday's Question:
Do you really want to be like Jesus?
My first response is "Of course I do!" But if I'm really honest, there are several difficult things that I have to do in order to make this happen, and I don't know that I want to do them. I have to commit to daily, intense time with God. I must seek him first in everything I do, then obey immediately. It's okay to question once, but then I must do his will, not mine. I must be willing to give up all creature comforts, talk to everyone I see about the gospel, pray for the good of my enemies, forgive anyone who does me wrong, treat my body like a temple of God with appropriate food and exercise, and be willing to accept humiliation, pain, and even death that I don't deserve. If I really wanted to be like Jesus, I'd be doing these things.
God, help me want to want to be like Jesus!
So for the rest of the week, I'll just send some of these questions to you. I think they are really valid and valuable for us to chew on for a while.
Verse:
2 Corinthians 3:18 And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.(NIV)
Tuesday's Question:
Do you really want to be like Jesus?
My first response is "Of course I do!" But if I'm really honest, there are several difficult things that I have to do in order to make this happen, and I don't know that I want to do them. I have to commit to daily, intense time with God. I must seek him first in everything I do, then obey immediately. It's okay to question once, but then I must do his will, not mine. I must be willing to give up all creature comforts, talk to everyone I see about the gospel, pray for the good of my enemies, forgive anyone who does me wrong, treat my body like a temple of God with appropriate food and exercise, and be willing to accept humiliation, pain, and even death that I don't deserve. If I really wanted to be like Jesus, I'd be doing these things.
God, help me want to want to be like Jesus!
Friday, March 27, 2009
God in a Box
Today's Verses Luke 20:27-40
Context:
Continuation of Jesus' activities the week of his crucifixion.
Text:
27Some of the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus with a question. 28"Teacher," they said, "Moses wrote for us that if a man's brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. 29Now there were seven brothers. The first one married a woman and died childless. 30The second 31and then the third married her, and in the same way the seven died, leaving no children. 32Finally, the woman died too. 33Now then, at the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?"
34Jesus replied, "The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35But those who are considered worthy of taking part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, 36and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God's children, since they are children of the resurrection. 37But in the account of the bush, even Moses showed that the dead rise, for he calls the Lord 'the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.'[a] 38He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive."
39Some of the teachers of the law responded, "Well said, teacher!" 40And no one dared to ask him any more questions. (NIV)
Footnotes:
Luke 20:37 Exodus 3:6
taken from www.biblegateway.com
The Bible doesn't really tell us much about the Sadducees, so I checked out the Nelson's New Illustrated Bible Dictionary. It says that the Sadducees came from the most powerful families in Israel -- merchants, priests, and aristocrats. The most powerful members of the priesthood were usually Sadducees.
The key difference between them and the Pharisees was the basis of their beliefs. Sadducees believed only the Pentateuch, the five books of the Law written by Moses. If something wasn't clearly stated there, they didn't believe it. Over time, others had created 'traditions' by trying to explain what the laws meant in specific situations, and the Sadducees vehemently disagreed with this practice. In addition, if something wasn't covered in the Pentateuch (like Heaven or Hell), they didn't believe it existed. They put God in a very tight box.
Apparently they enjoyed trying to lock others into a box, too. They liked to make fun of their opponents by showing how others beliefs led to ridiculous conclusions through such 'what if' questions as we see in this text.
To us, well at least to me, Jesus' answer seems pretty confusing. But when taken in context with the culture and the beliefs of the Sadducees, his response made them look more foolish than they'd intended to make him look! He spoke knowingly about several Biblical concepts, resurrection and angels, in which the Sadducees did not believe.
So, if we look at the text in chapter 20, Jesus has summarily made the Pharisees, Sadducess, teachers of the law, and priests all look foolish for trying to trap him. And since they had tried to do this in public, all of Jerusalem was buzzing with the public humiliation of the self-revered leaders of the people.
Do we ever use scripture to put God in a box like the Sadducees did? They picked and chose which books to believe and how to interpret them -- any one who interpreted a passage differently than they did was wrong. I think we do the same thing today when we try to apply passages that were specific to the culture of Biblical times to our current world -- AND when we write a passage off because of cultural differences by saying that the world was so different then that it surely must not apply today. Yes, I know that sounds like I'm on both sides of the fence, but we have to be careful not to blindly apply everything or to do the opposite and blindly write everything off because of such cultural differences. How can we maintain the proper balance?
Context:
Continuation of Jesus' activities the week of his crucifixion.
Text:
27Some of the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus with a question. 28"Teacher," they said, "Moses wrote for us that if a man's brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. 29Now there were seven brothers. The first one married a woman and died childless. 30The second 31and then the third married her, and in the same way the seven died, leaving no children. 32Finally, the woman died too. 33Now then, at the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?"
34Jesus replied, "The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35But those who are considered worthy of taking part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, 36and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God's children, since they are children of the resurrection. 37But in the account of the bush, even Moses showed that the dead rise, for he calls the Lord 'the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.'[a] 38He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive."
39Some of the teachers of the law responded, "Well said, teacher!" 40And no one dared to ask him any more questions. (NIV)
Footnotes:
Luke 20:37 Exodus 3:6
taken from www.biblegateway.com
The Bible doesn't really tell us much about the Sadducees, so I checked out the Nelson's New Illustrated Bible Dictionary. It says that the Sadducees came from the most powerful families in Israel -- merchants, priests, and aristocrats. The most powerful members of the priesthood were usually Sadducees.
The key difference between them and the Pharisees was the basis of their beliefs. Sadducees believed only the Pentateuch, the five books of the Law written by Moses. If something wasn't clearly stated there, they didn't believe it. Over time, others had created 'traditions' by trying to explain what the laws meant in specific situations, and the Sadducees vehemently disagreed with this practice. In addition, if something wasn't covered in the Pentateuch (like Heaven or Hell), they didn't believe it existed. They put God in a very tight box.
Apparently they enjoyed trying to lock others into a box, too. They liked to make fun of their opponents by showing how others beliefs led to ridiculous conclusions through such 'what if' questions as we see in this text.
To us, well at least to me, Jesus' answer seems pretty confusing. But when taken in context with the culture and the beliefs of the Sadducees, his response made them look more foolish than they'd intended to make him look! He spoke knowingly about several Biblical concepts, resurrection and angels, in which the Sadducees did not believe.
So, if we look at the text in chapter 20, Jesus has summarily made the Pharisees, Sadducess, teachers of the law, and priests all look foolish for trying to trap him. And since they had tried to do this in public, all of Jerusalem was buzzing with the public humiliation of the self-revered leaders of the people.
Do we ever use scripture to put God in a box like the Sadducees did? They picked and chose which books to believe and how to interpret them -- any one who interpreted a passage differently than they did was wrong. I think we do the same thing today when we try to apply passages that were specific to the culture of Biblical times to our current world -- AND when we write a passage off because of cultural differences by saying that the world was so different then that it surely must not apply today. Yes, I know that sounds like I'm on both sides of the fence, but we have to be careful not to blindly apply everything or to do the opposite and blindly write everything off because of such cultural differences. How can we maintain the proper balance?
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Questions
Today's Verses -- Luke 20:20-26
Context:
Jesus' final days before the crucifixion. He's been regularly showing the Pharisees how ungodly they were in subtle and not so subtle ways.
Text:
20Keeping a close watch on him, they sent spies, who pretended to be honest. They hoped to catch Jesus in something he said so that they might hand him over to the power and authority of the governor. 21So the spies questioned him: "Teacher, we know that you speak and teach what is right, and that you do not show partiality but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. 22Is it right for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
23He saw through their duplicity and said to them, 24"Show me a denarius. Whose portrait and inscription are on it?"
25"Caesar's," they replied. He said to them, "Then give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."
26They were unable to trap him in what he had said there in public. And astonished by his answer, they became silent. (NIV)
taken from www.biblegateway.com
It is so clear to me that the Pharisees had no idea who Jesus really was -- sending spies who pretended to be honest? Come on -- the Son of God could easily see through that! I wonder if he just shook his head, or even smiled a little when he saw these poor fools sauntering up to him. Did he wonder, "Is that the best they've got? They just don't get it!"
Can't you see it now -- the chief priests and teachers of the law meeting in a secret place trying to come up with questions that would trap Jesus? I'm sure they thought there was no possible answer for this one that didn't break either the Roman law or cause his faithful followers to be disappointed by his agreement to continue paying tax to extortioners.
But God always has a right answer -- and it's usually beyond the foresight of mere humans.
How often do we ask God questions, especially tough ones that we can't possibly comprehend the answers to? Such as 'why do good people have to suffer?' 'why didn't you make me ....(rich, beautiful, smart, whole, taller, talented, you fill in the blank)?', and 'how come I can't have ..... (again, fill in the blank)...so and so does and he doesn't appreciate it'.
I imagine he smiles a little and shakes his head at our ignorance. He may see these questions in the same manner as he saw the questions of those trying to trap him. No matter what he answers, we won't think it's fair. We can't begin to comprehend the big picture from Heaven's side of the universe, and until we walk through those pearly gates we will just have to trust that he is right.
Do you trust him when life doesn't make any sense?
Context:
Jesus' final days before the crucifixion. He's been regularly showing the Pharisees how ungodly they were in subtle and not so subtle ways.
Text:
20Keeping a close watch on him, they sent spies, who pretended to be honest. They hoped to catch Jesus in something he said so that they might hand him over to the power and authority of the governor. 21So the spies questioned him: "Teacher, we know that you speak and teach what is right, and that you do not show partiality but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. 22Is it right for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
23He saw through their duplicity and said to them, 24"Show me a denarius. Whose portrait and inscription are on it?"
25"Caesar's," they replied. He said to them, "Then give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."
26They were unable to trap him in what he had said there in public. And astonished by his answer, they became silent. (NIV)
taken from www.biblegateway.com
It is so clear to me that the Pharisees had no idea who Jesus really was -- sending spies who pretended to be honest? Come on -- the Son of God could easily see through that! I wonder if he just shook his head, or even smiled a little when he saw these poor fools sauntering up to him. Did he wonder, "Is that the best they've got? They just don't get it!"
Can't you see it now -- the chief priests and teachers of the law meeting in a secret place trying to come up with questions that would trap Jesus? I'm sure they thought there was no possible answer for this one that didn't break either the Roman law or cause his faithful followers to be disappointed by his agreement to continue paying tax to extortioners.
But God always has a right answer -- and it's usually beyond the foresight of mere humans.
How often do we ask God questions, especially tough ones that we can't possibly comprehend the answers to? Such as 'why do good people have to suffer?' 'why didn't you make me ....(rich, beautiful, smart, whole, taller, talented, you fill in the blank)?', and 'how come I can't have ..... (again, fill in the blank)...so and so does and he doesn't appreciate it'.
I imagine he smiles a little and shakes his head at our ignorance. He may see these questions in the same manner as he saw the questions of those trying to trap him. No matter what he answers, we won't think it's fair. We can't begin to comprehend the big picture from Heaven's side of the universe, and until we walk through those pearly gates we will just have to trust that he is right.
Do you trust him when life doesn't make any sense?
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Parable of the Tenants
Today's Verses -- Luke 20:9-19
Context:
Continuation from yesterday -- the Pharisees had questioned Jesus' authority and he asked them a question in return that they chose not to answer.
Text:
9He went on to tell the people this parable: "A man planted a vineyard, rented it to some farmers and went away for a long time. 10At harvest time he sent a servant to the tenants so they would give him some of the fruit of the vineyard. But the tenants beat him and sent him away empty-handed. 11He sent another servant, but that one also they beat and treated shamefully and sent away empty-handed. 12He sent still a third, and they wounded him and threw him out.
13"Then the owner of the vineyard said, 'What shall I do? I will send my son, whom I love; perhaps they will respect him.'
14"But when the tenants saw him, they talked the matter over. 'This is the heir,' they said. 'Let's kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.' 15So they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
"What then will the owner of the vineyard do to them? 16He will come and kill those tenants and give the vineyard to others." When the people heard this, they said, "May this never be!"
17Jesus looked directly at them and asked, "Then what is the meaning of that which is written: " 'The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone[a]'[b]?
18Everyone who falls on that stone will be broken to pieces, but he on whom it falls will be crushed."
19The teachers of the law and the chief priests looked for a way to arrest him immediately, because they knew he had spoken this parable against them. But they were afraid of the people. (NIV)
Footnotes:
Luke 20:17 Or cornerstone
Luke 20:17 Psalm 118:22
I've heard this parable several times, but I guess I never paid attention to the context before. Jesus just finished telling the chief priests and teachers of the law that he would not tell them by whose authority he was teaching and performing miracles. The parable is a very slightly camouflaged story of himself, his authority, and the sins of the Pharisees!
Based on the response of the people (see the blue writing, above), it seems like the meaning of this parable was pretty clear to them. They seemed to feel fearful for themselves that the parable was to become truth!
Were they, like us, indicating that they would never make the choices that the tenants made in the story? How many times have we scoffed at the Jews because of their regular pattern of disobedience despite the miracles they had personally witnessed? Or were they, like the teachers of the law and the chief priests, realizing that Jesus had spoken this parable against them?
This would probably be a good text to study using Mark Moore's methodology. Just reading it over brought lots of questions to my mind. I wanted to understand what the people who were listening actually heard and thought about the parable. Were the different servants who were sent to collect fruit from the farm treated with increasing violence? Why was the second one shamed, and in what way? Why is the response of the people to the parable interpreted so differently in the NIV and King James versions (in King James the people responded with "God forbid", which seems so much stronger to me)?
I don't really understand Jesus' use of Psalm 118 here, either. I can guess at it's meaning, but obviously the teachers of the law and the chief priests took this very personally. What was it about the culture of the time that made them so sure it was directed at them?
Sorry -- more questions than thoughts today, but I think Steve's overview of the methodology is really helping it to sink in!
Context:
Continuation from yesterday -- the Pharisees had questioned Jesus' authority and he asked them a question in return that they chose not to answer.
Text:
9He went on to tell the people this parable: "A man planted a vineyard, rented it to some farmers and went away for a long time. 10At harvest time he sent a servant to the tenants so they would give him some of the fruit of the vineyard. But the tenants beat him and sent him away empty-handed. 11He sent another servant, but that one also they beat and treated shamefully and sent away empty-handed. 12He sent still a third, and they wounded him and threw him out.
13"Then the owner of the vineyard said, 'What shall I do? I will send my son, whom I love; perhaps they will respect him.'
14"But when the tenants saw him, they talked the matter over. 'This is the heir,' they said. 'Let's kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.' 15So they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
"What then will the owner of the vineyard do to them? 16He will come and kill those tenants and give the vineyard to others." When the people heard this, they said, "May this never be!"
17Jesus looked directly at them and asked, "Then what is the meaning of that which is written: " 'The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone[a]'[b]?
18Everyone who falls on that stone will be broken to pieces, but he on whom it falls will be crushed."
19The teachers of the law and the chief priests looked for a way to arrest him immediately, because they knew he had spoken this parable against them. But they were afraid of the people. (NIV)
Footnotes:
Luke 20:17 Or cornerstone
Luke 20:17 Psalm 118:22
I've heard this parable several times, but I guess I never paid attention to the context before. Jesus just finished telling the chief priests and teachers of the law that he would not tell them by whose authority he was teaching and performing miracles. The parable is a very slightly camouflaged story of himself, his authority, and the sins of the Pharisees!
Based on the response of the people (see the blue writing, above), it seems like the meaning of this parable was pretty clear to them. They seemed to feel fearful for themselves that the parable was to become truth!
Were they, like us, indicating that they would never make the choices that the tenants made in the story? How many times have we scoffed at the Jews because of their regular pattern of disobedience despite the miracles they had personally witnessed? Or were they, like the teachers of the law and the chief priests, realizing that Jesus had spoken this parable against them?
This would probably be a good text to study using Mark Moore's methodology. Just reading it over brought lots of questions to my mind. I wanted to understand what the people who were listening actually heard and thought about the parable. Were the different servants who were sent to collect fruit from the farm treated with increasing violence? Why was the second one shamed, and in what way? Why is the response of the people to the parable interpreted so differently in the NIV and King James versions (in King James the people responded with "God forbid", which seems so much stronger to me)?
I don't really understand Jesus' use of Psalm 118 here, either. I can guess at it's meaning, but obviously the teachers of the law and the chief priests took this very personally. What was it about the culture of the time that made them so sure it was directed at them?
Sorry -- more questions than thoughts today, but I think Steve's overview of the methodology is really helping it to sink in!
Monday, March 23, 2009
The Unanswerable Question
Today's Verses -- Luke 20:1-8
Context:
We are still looking at the days prior to Jesus' crucifixion. We don't know exactly what day this is, but it is most likely Tuesday or Wednesday of Passover Week.
Text:
1One day as he was teaching the people in the temple courts and preaching the gospel, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, together with the elders, came up to him. 2"Tell us by what authority you are doing these things," they said. "Who gave you this authority?"
3He replied, "I will also ask you a question. Tell me, 4John's baptism—was it from heaven, or from men?"
5They discussed it among themselves and said, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will ask, 'Why didn't you believe him?' 6But if we say, 'From men,' all the people will stone us, because they are persuaded that John was a prophet."
7So they answered, "We don't know where it was from."
8Jesus said, "Neither will I tell you by what authority I am doing these things." (NIV)
taken from http://www.biblegateway.com/
When you think of someone 'preaching the gospel', what message do you expect? I expect something similar to Peter's speech on Pentecost when he talks about how Jesus came to be the ultimate sacrifice for us on the cross then rose again three days later. What do you think Jesus himself was telling the people the very week this was to happen?
Since we have been watching Mark Moore's lessons on how to study the Bible, I thought I'd try out some of the tools. I went to BlueLetterBible.org and clicked on the 'lexicon' button. I typed in 'gospel' and looked at the New Testament uses of that word. I saw that there were three words used in the the New Testament that were translated as 'gospel'. I clicked on the first one (euaggeizo) and it showed all the places where it was used, and Luke 20:1 was listed. That was quick!
So, according to this site, this particular use of the word means:
1) to bring good news, to announce glad tidings
a) used in the OT of any kind of good news
1) of the joyful tidings of God's kindness, in particular, of the Messianic blessings
b) in the NT used especially of the glad tidings of the coming kingdom of God, and of the salvation to be obtained in it through Christ, and of what relates to this salvation
c) glad tidings are brought to one, one has glad tidings proclaimed to him
d) to proclaim glad tidings
1) instruct (men) concerning the things that pertain to Christian salvation
So without trying to take anything out of context, I think it's safe to say that Jesus was talking about the coming kingdom of God, and possibly even hinting at how he was the one who would provide salvation to all. I wonder if it was harder to believe him when he spoke about coming events than it was for people to believe Peter when he talked about what had happened in the past?
I also especially like those texts where he stumps the Rabbis! How much trouble do we get into when we try to come up with answers that will be politically correct, as they did, instead of just speaking what we truly believe?
Context:
We are still looking at the days prior to Jesus' crucifixion. We don't know exactly what day this is, but it is most likely Tuesday or Wednesday of Passover Week.
Text:
1One day as he was teaching the people in the temple courts and preaching the gospel, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, together with the elders, came up to him. 2"Tell us by what authority you are doing these things," they said. "Who gave you this authority?"
3He replied, "I will also ask you a question. Tell me, 4John's baptism—was it from heaven, or from men?"
5They discussed it among themselves and said, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will ask, 'Why didn't you believe him?' 6But if we say, 'From men,' all the people will stone us, because they are persuaded that John was a prophet."
7So they answered, "We don't know where it was from."
8Jesus said, "Neither will I tell you by what authority I am doing these things." (NIV)
taken from http://www.biblegateway.com/
When you think of someone 'preaching the gospel', what message do you expect? I expect something similar to Peter's speech on Pentecost when he talks about how Jesus came to be the ultimate sacrifice for us on the cross then rose again three days later. What do you think Jesus himself was telling the people the very week this was to happen?
Since we have been watching Mark Moore's lessons on how to study the Bible, I thought I'd try out some of the tools. I went to BlueLetterBible.org and clicked on the 'lexicon' button. I typed in 'gospel' and looked at the New Testament uses of that word. I saw that there were three words used in the the New Testament that were translated as 'gospel'. I clicked on the first one (euaggeizo) and it showed all the places where it was used, and Luke 20:1 was listed. That was quick!
So, according to this site, this particular use of the word means:
1) to bring good news, to announce glad tidings
a) used in the OT of any kind of good news
1) of the joyful tidings of God's kindness, in particular, of the Messianic blessings
b) in the NT used especially of the glad tidings of the coming kingdom of God, and of the salvation to be obtained in it through Christ, and of what relates to this salvation
c) glad tidings are brought to one, one has glad tidings proclaimed to him
d) to proclaim glad tidings
1) instruct (men) concerning the things that pertain to Christian salvation
So without trying to take anything out of context, I think it's safe to say that Jesus was talking about the coming kingdom of God, and possibly even hinting at how he was the one who would provide salvation to all. I wonder if it was harder to believe him when he spoke about coming events than it was for people to believe Peter when he talked about what had happened in the past?
I also especially like those texts where he stumps the Rabbis! How much trouble do we get into when we try to come up with answers that will be politically correct, as they did, instead of just speaking what we truly believe?
Friday, March 20, 2009
Righteous Anger
Today's Verses -- Luke 19:45-48
Context:
Continuation of Jesus' last days. He's just entered Jerusalem and wept for its future.
Text:
45Then he entered the temple area and began driving out those who were selling. 46"It is written," he said to them, " 'My house will be a house of prayer'[a]; but you have made it 'a den of robbers.'[b]"
47Every day he was teaching at the temple. But the chief priests, the teachers of the law and the leaders among the people were trying to kill him. 48Yet they could not find any way to do it, because all the people hung on his words. (NIV)
Footnotes:
Luke 19:46 Isaiah 56:7
Luke 19:46 Jer. 7:11
taken from www.biblegateway.com
This specific situation at the beginning of "Passion Week" is covered in both Matthew and Mark. In addition, John tells of a temple cleansing event near the beginning of Jesus' ministry. When you first enter the temple, there is an area called the 'Outer Court of the Gentiles', which was a large area (many acres) where the Gentiles were allowed to enter and worship God. Many Jews arrived in Jerusalem for the week of Passover to be cleansed and to celebrate the holiday. It was difficult for them to bring their sacrifices from long distances, so merchants set up table to sell all kinds of animals and birds necessary for the Jewish rituals. In addition, anyone visiting had to pay their temple tax in the proper currency of Jerusalem, but often they had to exchange their local currency for the appropriate coins. Budding entrepreneurs jumped right in to meet the needs of the people -- charging exorbitant rates for these services. We don't know if the merchants were Jews or Gentiles, but it doesn't really matter -- the priests allowed a marketplace (probably a very noisy one) to invade the spaces reserved for prayer and worship.
Think about the mindset of Jesus at this time. He had been weeping for the people -- distraught by their lack of obedience and the punishment they were facing. Then, to add to that pain he sees people profiting off of those who have sacrificed much to travel long distances to worship. Instead of a quiet, worshipful environment the pilgrims encountered loud vendors trying to lure them to purchase all kinds of animals and other religious tokens. There was no sense of reverence to be found. This must have been a final affront to Jesus' sensibilities.
To be honest, I'm surprised that Jesus didn't call on his full power as God to create an earthquake or lightning storm to wipe the merchants away completely! This is the most angry we see him during his entire three year ministry. I imagine he is thinking of the horrors he will face in the next week and is totally insulted by the fact that people are profiting from the sacrificial ritual -- knowing that he will become the ultimate sacrifice in just a few days.
I appreciate the writers of the Bible showing us the many different facets of Jesus' emotions. Yes, righteous anger is definitely a quality of God, but Jesus shows us that it's ok for us to be angry too. But it's that 'righteous' part that is most important! Jesus doesn't get angry because his meals aren't prepared on time or because someone is discriminating against him, he gets angry when people aren't revering his father and obeying the law.
What makes you angry? How can we as Christians display righteous anger without letting our human pettiness show? What issues today require us to be vocal in our representation of Jesus? How do you respond?
Context:
Continuation of Jesus' last days. He's just entered Jerusalem and wept for its future.
Text:
45Then he entered the temple area and began driving out those who were selling. 46"It is written," he said to them, " 'My house will be a house of prayer'[a]; but you have made it 'a den of robbers.'[b]"
47Every day he was teaching at the temple. But the chief priests, the teachers of the law and the leaders among the people were trying to kill him. 48Yet they could not find any way to do it, because all the people hung on his words. (NIV)
Footnotes:
Luke 19:46 Isaiah 56:7
Luke 19:46 Jer. 7:11
taken from www.biblegateway.com
This specific situation at the beginning of "Passion Week" is covered in both Matthew and Mark. In addition, John tells of a temple cleansing event near the beginning of Jesus' ministry. When you first enter the temple, there is an area called the 'Outer Court of the Gentiles', which was a large area (many acres) where the Gentiles were allowed to enter and worship God. Many Jews arrived in Jerusalem for the week of Passover to be cleansed and to celebrate the holiday. It was difficult for them to bring their sacrifices from long distances, so merchants set up table to sell all kinds of animals and birds necessary for the Jewish rituals. In addition, anyone visiting had to pay their temple tax in the proper currency of Jerusalem, but often they had to exchange their local currency for the appropriate coins. Budding entrepreneurs jumped right in to meet the needs of the people -- charging exorbitant rates for these services. We don't know if the merchants were Jews or Gentiles, but it doesn't really matter -- the priests allowed a marketplace (probably a very noisy one) to invade the spaces reserved for prayer and worship.
Think about the mindset of Jesus at this time. He had been weeping for the people -- distraught by their lack of obedience and the punishment they were facing. Then, to add to that pain he sees people profiting off of those who have sacrificed much to travel long distances to worship. Instead of a quiet, worshipful environment the pilgrims encountered loud vendors trying to lure them to purchase all kinds of animals and other religious tokens. There was no sense of reverence to be found. This must have been a final affront to Jesus' sensibilities.
To be honest, I'm surprised that Jesus didn't call on his full power as God to create an earthquake or lightning storm to wipe the merchants away completely! This is the most angry we see him during his entire three year ministry. I imagine he is thinking of the horrors he will face in the next week and is totally insulted by the fact that people are profiting from the sacrificial ritual -- knowing that he will become the ultimate sacrifice in just a few days.
I appreciate the writers of the Bible showing us the many different facets of Jesus' emotions. Yes, righteous anger is definitely a quality of God, but Jesus shows us that it's ok for us to be angry too. But it's that 'righteous' part that is most important! Jesus doesn't get angry because his meals aren't prepared on time or because someone is discriminating against him, he gets angry when people aren't revering his father and obeying the law.
What makes you angry? How can we as Christians display righteous anger without letting our human pettiness show? What issues today require us to be vocal in our representation of Jesus? How do you respond?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)